Article Sidebar

Submitted
Feb 25, 2021
Accepted
Jun 22, 2021
Published
Jun 22, 2021
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 141 Download : 2347

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to know the authority of prosecutors in applying restorative justice and what are the limitations of criminal acts can be done restorative justice efforts. The research uses a type of literature research with a normative approach that is analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that the Public Prosecutor (JPU) has the right to stop the prosecution of defendants in certain cases, if the victim and the accused agree on peace as stipulated in The Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia Regulation No. 15 of 2020 Restorative justice approach, victims and perpetrators of criminal acts are expected to achieve peace by putting forward a win-win solution The limitation of a criminal offense can be done termination of prosecution with a restorative justice approach provided that the perpetrator is not a recidivist, his criminal acts are threatened with a fine or threatened with a prison sentence of not more than five years, criminal acts committed with the value of evidence or loss value of not more than 2.5 million rupiahs. The peace process is conducted by the parties voluntarily, with deliberations for consensus, without pressure, coercion, and intimidation. In the peace process, the Public Prosecutor serves as a facilitator which means that it has no interest or connection with the case, victim, or suspect, either personally or professionally, directly or indirectly.

Keywords

Termination of Prosecution Justice Prosecutor Attorney General Restorative Justice

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under :

 Creative Commons License a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

How to Cite
Dewi, D. K. (2021). Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Menghentikan Penuntutan Demi Keadilan. Diktum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.24905/diktum.v9i1.135

References

  1. Afiah, R. N. (1998). Barang Bukti dalam Proses Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
  2. Azis, A. M. (2014). Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Kencana.
  3. Effendy, M. (2014). Teori Hukum dari Perspektif Kebijakan Perbandingan dan Harmonisasi Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Refrensi.
  4. Hadi, S. (1990). Metodelogi Research. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada Universiti Press.
  5. Hasibuan, L. R. (2015, November). Restorative Justice Sebagai Pembaharuan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Berdasarkan UU No.11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. USU Law Journal, 3(3), 67.
  6. Mahardika, D. (2021). Formulation of Correctional System Model in Corruption Enforcement in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10(1), 866-871.
  7. Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  8. Octavianne, H. (2020). Penuntutan dengan Hati Nurani. Surabaya: Reative.
  9. Santoso. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Korban Kejahatan Pada Tahap Penuntutan Dalam Prespektif Restorative Justice (Studi Kasus Penganiyayaan di Kota Malang). Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang).
  10. Sariranastiti. (2021). Implementasi Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif (Studi Di Kejaksaan Negeri Gunungkidul). Malang: Universitas Brawijaya.
  11. Wibowo, K. T. (2020). Hukum dan Keadilan (Peradilan yang Tidak Kunjung Adil. Depok: Papas Sinar Sinanti.
  12. Zaenudin, A. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum . Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.