Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is conceptual research that intends to examine the idea of democracy in progressive legal development. As a means of state policy, the development of laws carries a variety of implications. During that time the law was only understood as a rigid rule and put too much emphasis on aspects of the legal system regardless of the relationship between the law and the issues that had to be addressed, such as social issues. The law is synonymous with the order as a mirror of the regulation of the ruler, on the other hand, there is also an understanding of the law that emphasizes more on the legitimacy aspect of the rule itself. Responsive law is results-oriented, i.e. on goals that will be achieved outside the law. A hallmark of responsive law is the search for implied values contained in rules and policies. In this responsive legal model, they express disapproval of what they consider to be standardized and inflexible interpretations. Legal products that are responsive to the manufacturing process is democratic, namely participation, which invites the participation of as many elements of society as possible, both in terms of individuals, and community groups, and must also aspire to come from the wishes or desires of the community. This means that the product of the law is not the authority of the ruler to simply legitimize his power.  


 

Keywords

Democratization Development Legal Responsibility.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sanusi, S., Idayanti, S., & Widyastuti, T. V. (2020). Demokratisasi dalam Rangka Pembangunan Hukum Responsif. Diktum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 182 - 191. https://doi.org/10.24905/diktum.v8i2.84

References

  1. Azhary, M. T. (1992). Negara Hukum . Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.
  2. Handoyo, B. (2018). Konfigurasi Politik Hukum Pertanahan Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Responsif. AT-TASYRI': JURNAL ILMIAH PRODI MUAMALAH, 21-38.
  3. Mahfud, M. (1995, Juli 7). Konfigurasi Politik dan Karakter Produk Hukum, Otoriter dan Konservatif. Artikele Majalah Prisma, pp. 17-33.
  4. Mahfud, M. (2001). Politik Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pt Pustaka LP3ES.
  5. Mahfud, M. (2009). Capaian Dan Proyeksi Kondisi Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, 16(3), 292 – 293.
  6. Marpaung, L. A. (2003). Pengaruh Konfigurasi Politik Hukum Terhadap karakter Produk Hukum,(suatu telaah dalam perkembangan hukum pemerintahan daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Univ Bandar lampung, 54-64.
  7. Parlindungan, G. T. (2018). Prinsip-prinsip Negara Hukum dan Demokrasi Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 16(2), 384-400. doi:https://doi.org/10.31849/respublica.v16i2.1447
  8. Pratama, E. A. (2020). Business Ethics And Legal Liability In The Management Of State-Owned Enterprises. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(15), 1401-407. Retrieved from http://www.jcreview.com/?mno=22413
  9. Satjipto Rahadjo. (1985). Hukum Dalam Perspektif Sejarah dan Perubahan SosPembangunan Hukum dalam Perspektif Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: LBH.Yogyakarta dan Rajawali.
  10. Yunanto. (2010). Menuju Strategi Pembangunan Hukum yang Responsif. e-journal Undip, 164-171.