Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jul 22, 2020
Accepted
Aug 21, 2022
Published
Aug 21, 2022
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 70 Download : 99

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review the decision of the Constitutional Court made due to the criminal act of bribery on constitutional judges. Based on the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945 in article 24 C and Article 10 paragraph (1) of Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court states that the Constitutional Court has the authority to adjudicate at the first and last level whose decision is final, namely a decision that immediately obtains permanent legal force since it is pronounced and no legal remedy can be taken. However, what would be the legal consequences if the Constitutional Court's decision was made on the basis of the criminal act of bribery. This research is a conceptual study that examines the thoughts of reviewing the Constitutional Court's decision on the existence of a bribery crime. The results of this study include (1) the legal consequences if the decision of the Constitutional Court is made on the basis of the criminal act of bribery is Null and Void with all its consequences, and (2) The decision of the criminal case may be used as a basis for review of the decision of the Constitutional Court.

Keywords

Reconsideration , Decision of the Constitutional Court Crime

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under :

 Creative Commons License a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

How to Cite
Hartoyo, D., Rizkianto, K., Mahardika, D., & Pratama, E. A. (2022). Dapatkah Putusan Perkara Pidana Dijadikan Sebagai Dasar Peninjauan Ulang Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Diktum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(1), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.24905/diktum.v9i1.94

References

  1. Ali, Achmad. (2002). Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis & Sosiologis).
  2. Jakarta: Toko Buku Agung.
  3. Arief, Barda Nawawi. (1986). Penetapan Pidana Penjara Dalam Perundang-undangan Dalam Rangka Usaha Menanggulangi Kajahatan, Bandung : Universitas Padjadjaran.
  4. Atmasasmita, Romli. (2012). Teori Hukum Integratif Rekontruksi Terhadap Teori Hukum dan Teori Hukum Progresif. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
  5. Daulay, Ikhsan Rosyada Parluhutan. (2006). Mahkamah Konstitusi; Memahami Keberadaannya Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  6. Fatkhurrohman, dkk. (2004). Memahami Keberadaan Mahkamah Konstitusi di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
  7. Huda, Ni’matul. (2006). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. Kusuma, Mahmud. (2009). Menyelami Semangat Hukum Progresif; Terapi Paradigmatik
  8. Atas Lemahnya Penegakan Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Antony Lib bekerjasama LSHP.
  9. Rahardjo, Satjipto. (1982). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Alumni.
  10. Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2009). Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
  11. Tim Penyusun. (2001). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional dan Balai Pustaka.
  12. Yunus, Ahsan. (2011). Analisis Yuridis Sifat Final Dan Mengikat (Binding) Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. JURNAL KONSTITUSI Volume III Nomor 2, November 2011.
  13. Malik. (2009). Telaah Makna Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Final dan Mengikat. Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 6 No. 1, April 2009.
  14. Manan, Bagir. (1999). Penelitian di Bidang Hukum, Jurnal Hukum Puslitbangkum Nomor 1-1999.
  15. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
  16. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.
  17. Undang Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.